Sunday, May 31, 2009

A Lesson on the Constitution

Senior Fellow at WHO radio think tank for truth, John Haskins, joins Steve Deace to respond to audio from a recent Des Moines Register roundtable on same-sex "marriages" in Iowa.

Click HERE and go down about one page length and look for "Veritas: Register Sodomy Panel".
Listen to the interview and understand why same-sex "marriages" are illegal in Iowa and Massachusetts.

Friday, May 29, 2009

Survey Says...

A majority of Americans still oppose same-sex "marriages" in the U.S. according to a USA Today/Gallup poll, but with no significant changes on either side of the issue as compared to last year.

Read full story HERE.
A question that I found interesting was the following:
Should gays or lesbians be hired as elementary school teachers? What I would like to add to this question is: should gays or lesbians be hired as elementary school teachers IF they are known to be tied to a pro-gay organization, such as GLADD? On the flip side, should heterosexuals be hired as elementary school teachers if they are known to be tied to pro-family organizations?
What do you think??

Thursday, May 14, 2009

A Lesson on Tolerance

A caller from Andover, Ma called this past Tuesday, 5/12/09, into the Jim & Margery show on 96.9 FM WTKK. The caller successfully refuted Jim's claim that homosexuals are born gay in which Jim cited the American Psychological Association (APA) to prove his point that homosexuals are born gay. As I was listening to this I thought about the fact that there is no conclusive evidence to prove that homosexuals are born gay and that the APA just recently changed their position on the 'gay gene' theory.

I had to e-mail Jim at the WTKK website with the following comments:
It is funny,Jim, how you tried, and failed mind you, to refute the caller from Andover and his claim that people are NOT born gay on Tuesday's May 12th, 2009 show. Why don't you have the podcast available of this call (Click HERE to see that it is not available) such that others can hear your "tolerance of the opposition", but yet you hang up on the caller from Andover sounding like the "tolerant" talk show host that you claim to be.
Before you DON'T publish this comment (on your website), I strongly suggest that you look at the most recent position that the American Psychological Association (APA) has taken on the 'gay gene' theory. The APA just recently stated the following in a brochure called, "Answers to Your Questions for a Better Understanding of Sexual Orientation & Homosexuality". Click HERE to read full brochure and click on "What causes a person to have a particular sexual orientation?" which states the following:
The new statement says:
"There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles. ..."
If you wish to take part in a civil dialog on this matter please do not hesitate to e-mail me directly or to visit my blog because the rest of my readers are waiting for a comment from you that I will not "hang-up" on.
Sincerely,
Scia Ciantee
Ironically an article published on WorldNetDaily on Tuesday the 12th discussed this issue in detail and essentially refuted what Jim, and many others, have claimed regarding the 'gay gene' theory. Now, if only Jim could be a talk show host who could do his homework before his show. If Jim could just express just a little bit of open-mindedness to callers who don't agree with what he says then maybe more people could engage in a discussion on the show without being hung-up on because of differing opinions.
Jim, what was that word you used before you let the caller go..."tolerance", which is defined as:
The endurance of the presence or actions of objectionable persons, or of the expression of offensive opinions; toleration.
Your show would be a lot better, Jim, if you just let people express their opinion and not rely on yours as the only one that exists.

Powered by Blogger

Sign my Guestbook from Bravenet.com Get your Free Guestbook from Bravenet.com