Saturday, August 30, 2008

"Facts Do Not Cease To Exist Because They Are Ignored." - Aldous Huxley

Former Massachusetts Govorner Mitt Romney, the founding father of same-sex "marriages" in this country, can not hide from the facts that same-sex "marriages" are STILL illegal across the U.S. eventhough Massachusetts and California ALLOW them.

Why didn't Romney stop the authorization of same-sex "marriage" licenses? What people will do to run for president even at the expense of voters rights.
Read the facts about the illegal same-sex "marriages" in this country and then attempt to refute them.
Also, if you missed it, read up on how Romney invented same-sex "marriages" in Massachusetts with the help of pro-family organizations such as the Massachusetts Family Institute. Click HERE to read the infamous John Haskins report.

14 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow, I’m always amazed at how people scream and scream “it’s still illegal” and I have yet to hear of a lawsuit proving it. If it’s truly illegal don’t just say it’s illegal, take’m to court.

I honestly don’t know or really care if it’s illegal; sometimes real justice rides on illegality.

Ken Weaver

9:34 AM, August 31, 2008  
OpenID dmurphy98 said...

Using Gregg Jackson to bolster your position is like using a fish to demonstrate how to ride a bicycle. Only a fish would be more intelligent than Jackson.

5:13 PM, September 01, 2008  
Blogger SCIA said...

dmurphy,

Interesting, because I don't hear you on the radio sqaulking about your propaganda and "trying" to make sense.

Give me a break "d", you know the truth when you hear it. Don't be bashful, just admit it!

8:00 PM, September 06, 2008  
Anonymous John Haskins said...

Thanks, Ken Weaver for the (accidental) honesty. Admitting that your respect for the law is roughly at the level of Stalin and Hitler is a start.

Second:
"Amazed," are you? You say a lawsuit would by now have proven these fraudulent sodomy "marriages" are illegal?

Yeah, okay,

Your honesty score just hit the floor. You know perfectly well that most judges, politicians, bureaucrats and journalists share your bias that a militant anti-democratic, anti-child, anti-religious freedom, anti-private property, anti-parents' rights fringe should have dictatorial power over all others and that laws and constitutions and the Declaration of Independence are meaningless -- why would you wonder why there has been no sucessful lawsuit proving that Romney's sodomy-based counterfeit "marriages" are fraudulent?

Just because there are no tanks in the streets doesn't mean we still have a legal system as opposed to kangaroo courts run by neo-communist hacks reading off verdicts phoned in from the local branch office of Big Sodomy International.

Please! You pretend for OUR benefit that you believe that laws and our state and federal constitutions and solemnly sworn oaths of office are being honored? Why excert yourself acting out such hypocrisies for us? The cat is already out of the bag.

After all, you yourself have just taken great pride in announcing that your subjective wishes and fantasies should be enforced AS IF they were the law.

Judges may be very slightly more discreet about their homo-fascist sympathies and Nazi "jurisprudence" than you are, but do you seriously think everyone is stupid enough to join you in pretending that the legal system would have sorted out the truth by now?

You wrote: "sometimes real justice rides on illegality."

And hey, look! There's Ken Weaver riding along behind it, grinning and gyrating while running over freedom of speech, religious freedom, parents' rights, childhood innocence, the rule of law, democracy, constitutions...!

Hey, when's Kristallnacht? You don't want to miss the party when all the churches are burned and Christians are killed and arrested!

Where, Ken, does your passion for "Real Justice" as you watch the formerly "Free World" degenerate into a pro-sodomy "utopia" in which freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, equal protection under the law and 5000 years of parents' rights are taken away, supplanted by governmment-enforced pro-sodomy brainwashing from cradle to grave and Stalinist-type "hate" crimes laws to punish people who think you are full of horse manure.

As for rebutting poor "dMurphy's" embarassing belch, let it ring in his ears as one of his greatest intellectual achievements.

I'm stunned that even a product of the above-mentioned brainwashing could be proud to drop evidence of his primitive hatred in a semi-public place.

Just go beat up Christians in an alley somewhere and then charge THEM with a "hate crime."

That would be more intellectually impressive than the droppings you leave here and there as evidence that you can read and write.

10:23 PM, September 06, 2008  
OpenID dmurphy98 said...

Oh, come on! I would have expected something better than that! What's next? "I know you are but what am I?"

I do know the truth when I hear it, and I'm not afraid to admit it. I've just never heard it from that pundit putz Gregg Jackson.

8:59 AM, September 07, 2008  
Blogger Ken Weaver said...

“Thanks, Ken Weaver for the (accidental) honesty. Admitting that your respect for the law is roughly at the level of Stalin and Hitler is a start.”

Why you’re welcome Mr. Haskins, although I find it odd that you would compare it to Stalin and Hitler. If they didn’t like the law they could easily change it into something more appealing. I’m sure they both loved the law even more than I considering they used the law and people’s respect for the law to become tyrants.

“Your honesty score just hit the floor.”

WTF are you talking about?

“You know perfectly well that most judges, politicians, bureaucrats and journalists share your bias that a militant anti-democratic, anti-child, anti-religious freedom, anti-private property, anti-parents' rights fringe should have dictatorial power over all others and that laws and constitutions and the Declaration of Independence are meaningless -- why would you wonder why there has been no sucessful lawsuit proving that Romney's sodomy-based counterfeit "marriages" are fraudulent?”

Really? Are these the same politicians that the Evangelical vote has been so successful at getting into office?

“You pretend for OUR benefit that you believe that laws and our state and federal constitutions and solemnly sworn oaths of office are being honored?”

Sadly it’s not. The current president who so blatantly holds up the religious right as his own personal agenda has used the legislature to subvert the constitution. It wasn’t I that voted for him! It was the religious right, the evangelical and moral majority vote that brought him into office! The Supreme Court granted him that office after the voting debacle with Gore. And he’s had 2 additions to that Supreme Court. And until a few years ago his same party had control of the senate and congress. Thanks to the American public a good number of them like Richard Santorum were summarily shown the door and told not to let it hit them in the ass on the way out. And now you cry for the good old days; kiss my ass!

“After all, you yourself have just taken great pride in announcing that your subjective wishes and fantasies should be enforced AS IF they were the law.”

That’s what the democratic system is all about dummy. I vote for laws that I like and against those I don’t.

“Judges may be very slightly more discreet about their homo-fascist sympathies and Nazi "jurisprudence" than you are, but do you seriously think everyone is stupid enough to join you in pretending that the legal system would have sorted out the truth by now?”

Homo-fascist sympathies and Nazi-jurisprudence?? What a coupling; Nazi and homosexuality. Anyway I would think someone would have gotten to court by now if it were really illegal. Heck it only took 2 weeks after AZ voted in a proposition against illegal immigration for the bleeding hearts to try and toss it out on the basis of discrimination. How long has the “illegal” marriages been going on now?

“There's Ken Weaver riding along behind it, grinning and gyrating while running over freedom of speech, religious freedom, parents' rights, childhood innocence, the rule of law, democracy, constitutions...!”

Yay I’m in a parade!

“Hey, when's Kristallnacht? You don't want to miss the party when all the churches are burned and Christians are killed and arrested!”

I don’t know, all of us Nazi-homo-anti religious people are still working on that. But our ghost leaders Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Paine and the others need to come back from heaven first, they already killed Christ so your second coming isn’t coming anymore. John Adams said it was easy; Christ just turned the other cheek.

Well Mr. Haskins, I’ve grown weary of playing along. Your little tirade was certainly educating into how little you know. I am an advocate of freedom. Not the freedom you cling to where the religious right tells people how to live, but the kind of freedom that allows free thought and free expression. Freedom of speech to tell me how dumb I am like you just used and the freedom of speech to tell you to screw off. The freedom to say George Bush junior and senior are jerks and have little to say that I respect. I hope you always have the freedom that is guaranteed by our constitution and the ones not outlined in the constitution. I want people to have the freedom to be jerks just like you and the freedom to sleep with whoever they wish. The freedom to choose to worship or not and the freedom to choose ones marriage partner no matter the number or the sex as long as they can understand the implications and commitment of such a union. I don’t think people should have the right to teach children about god because it causes nightmares and a complete misunderstanding of reality. Yes I know I’m extreme, but extremism is a right I enjoy. I know that all the freedoms I want us all to have goes against what most of us have been taught our whole lives, that an adherence to the Christian views of morality is paramount to our society; but I disagree on the basis of reality and Christian history.

If you would like to have a real discussion I’m game, but if all you’ve got is sanctimonious attitudes and a tongue for sarcasm I’ll ignore you or once in a while I’ll play along until you bore me and I tell you to shove it.

10:16 AM, September 07, 2008  
OpenID dmurphy98 said...

John Haskins:

Take the tinfoil hat off and get back on your medication, immediately!!!

5:10 PM, September 07, 2008  
Blogger SCIA said...

dmurphy,

I have yet read anything from you refuting what Mr. Jackson has said.

Will you have a "go" at it anytime soon or will you just stoop to name calling?

8:00 PM, September 12, 2008  
OpenID dmurphy98 said...

Why would I try to refute what is simply not true? I would rather argue with someone who tells me the sky is green and grass is blue. Their arguments would still not change the facts or reality.

Since I guess I'm presented with two choices, i.e. refute Greggy's pathetic viewpoints or stoop to name calling, I'll take name calling. Gregg Jackson is a homophobic douche.

Gee, that felt terrific!

9:44 AM, September 13, 2008  
Blogger John Hosty-Grinnell said...

Mr. Haskins letter among other things is incorrectly addressed. A Massachusetts Governor is addressed as "Your excellency", not "honorable". You'd think that 44 "leaders" would have known that before penning their name to this letter.

Your denial of reality in no way lessens the enjoyment of my equality. Too bad we can't talk about how to live together as peaceful neighbors, I guess that was never in the plan.

The answer seems to be that we will continue to fight each other in public forums like this one, and let the public see our true colors. How does one do that from the cloak of anonymity Scia? ;)

6:32 AM, September 16, 2008  
Blogger John Hosty-Grinnell said...

Perhaps Wilbur didn't take the letter seriously because most of the signitures are from out of the state.

6:36 AM, September 16, 2008  
OpenID dmurphy98 said...

Here's another fact.

The Connecticut Supreme Court found that Connecticut cannot deny same sex couples the equal protection of marriage.

Suck on that, Haskins.

1:01 PM, October 10, 2008  
Anonymous Rufus said...

Wow, nothing new here in over a month. Any chance SCIA has seen the light, and recognizes the error of his ways? Or maybe he's off collecting signatures for Massresistance...

10:19 AM, October 14, 2008  
OpenID dmurphy98 said...

Well, as much as I can disagree with Scia's position, I do hope he is well.

6:08 PM, October 19, 2008  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger

Sign my Guestbook from Bravenet.com Get your Free Guestbook from Bravenet.com