Friday, January 05, 2007

"...Using Children as Pawns for Adults..."

Photobucket - Video and Image HostingA Canadian pro-family activist says a recent ruling by the highest court in Ontario could prove to be more harmful to Canadian society than even legalized same-sex "marriage." Read Here for the full article.

Now, how is it in any way beneficial for a child to live with three parents? Oh, that's right, the old comeback of "how will it affect you" statement is conjured up.
What I am asking is how is three parents beneficial to a child instead of the normal two parents that consists of a mother and a father?
....Anyone, anyone???
Scia

9 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Seems we are taking this village raising a child thing to seriously.

Once again we se government trying to force its will on the people. Soon we will find all our children as wards of the state if we citizens do nothing about removing these social engineers from elective office.

Citizens, put on your eyeglasses. Government DOES NOT have YOUR best interest in mind.

11:06 AM, January 05, 2007  
Blogger SCIA said...

Well said Anonymous!!

Thanks for stopping by.

How did you hear about my blog?

7:50 PM, January 05, 2007  
Anonymous OMD said...

Scia, I heard about your blog through an email I was sent. By-the-way, this is OMD. I pushed submit before inputting my byline :~)

5:49 AM, January 06, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If two is better than one, why is three not better than two?

4:19 PM, January 08, 2007  
Blogger SCIA said...

Anonymous,

I will post my question again. Please try and stick to the rules of engagement when it comes to taking part in civil discourse.

I ask a question, you answer it. Then you, or whomever else, asks a question and I answer it.

Sound good??

What I am asking is how is three parents beneficial to a child instead of the normal two parents that consists of a mother and a father?

6:39 PM, January 08, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It seems that with 3 or mor parents that it would be more likely that a parent would always be around the child. No more latchkey kids.

9:52 PM, January 08, 2007  
Anonymous OMD said...

Anonymous, let's be very realistic here. 3 or more parents is suggestive of polygamy.

Now, children that are socialized around reasonable, responsible & moral adults tend to function or fare better in society.

Let's be really upfront here. The sexual behavior of people in anything other than an exclusive one man/one woman married environment is not healthy for children. It gives them a warped sense of values regarding sexuality. It is not good role modeling.

God does not ordain these alternate sexual practices, plain & simple.

So, you may have put an end to latchkey children, in your view, but your scenario has put them in behavorial jeapardy. I have yet to hear a valid position for any sexual 'behavior' other than the traditional marriage man/woman setting.

Canada has it wrong, Again!

OMD

6:10 PM, January 10, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The sexual behavior of people in anything other than an exclusive one man/one woman married environment is not healthy for children. It gives them a warped sense of values regarding sexuality."

how so?

"God does not ordain these alternate sexual practices, plain & simple."

he used to.

" I have yet to hear a valid position for any sexual 'behavior' other than the traditional marriage man/woman setting."

doggie style is my favorite position. much better than the traditional missionary position.

10:00 PM, January 10, 2007  
Anonymous OMD said...

Anonymous, I am glad that you respond.

The key to successful discussion is to develop a mature adult exhange of relevant ideas and opinions.

When presented in that manner fruitful or successful discussion can take place.

To answer your "how so?" question regarding the development of children's healthy sexual values...

First - we are all imperfect creatures. There is not one of us that walks this planet, save Jesus, that is perfect in any way.The Bible teaches us that we have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.

God made a woman to be a help mate or partner to a man. This man and woman are to mate with each other to produce offspring or in other words, male & female human beings.

God also made all the animals male and female for the distinct purpose of producing like offspring within their species.

Now a woman having physical sexual relations with another woman falls short of God's standard regarding sexual behavior. The same is true concerning man on man sexual behavior.

God's standard has not been met.

So the key is to determine what God's standard is.

Using the Bible as that guide we find that God indicates man/man & woman/woman homosexual behavior is not something He condones. Read the book Romans chapter 1 as an example.

Now that the groundwork has been set I can answer you.

Children tend to parrot what they see adults saying and doing. Their minds are innocent and can be molded like potter's clay. They do not have an ability to truly discern the difference between what is right and wrong.

If the children are being taught that man/man or woman/woman sexual behavior is "normal" then they have been taught to rebel against God's word. Thus, they have been taught that God's word is irrelevant.

If God's word is irrelevant regarding the act of homosexual behavior then the rest of God's word is irrelevant because, if He is wrong, even once, then He is fallible and imperfect.

If God is fallible He cannot be God. He would just be one of us.WE would all THEN be equal to god because we, who are also fallible, have already determined that mankind is imperfect.

The only standard would then be that which mankind makes and we all know that every man's way is right in his own eyes. There would be no absolutes.

Men were created to desire women & women, men. To teach children anything but that is to corrupt their minds. Thus, corrupting their sexual values by teaching and modeling a behavior that God has instructed us not to pursue because it is a corruption of the mind.

Anonymous, God NEVER condoned alternate behavioral lifestyles. Mankind was created with free will, the ability to make choices, the ability to turn to or turn away from God and His teachings. The Bible teaches that your premise ~ "he used to" ~ has fallen short of God's word. He used to is suggestive that God changes.

God is the same today as He was yesterday and He will be the same tomorrow. A changeable God is a fallible God because if God is changeable He is fallible. If God is always right then He cannot change because to change would indicate fallibility.

So anonymous, what differentiates us from the animals, that act instinctually, is that we have a mind, body & soul and can choose how we behave, whether that be for or against God's word. Animals cannot do that.

We are created in God's image.

Mankind tries to justify itself by creating a changeable God made in mankind's image.

OMD

9:16 PM, January 22, 2007  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger

Sign my Guestbook from Bravenet.com Get your Free Guestbook from Bravenet.com